Anyone who lives along San Francisco Bay has seen the signs, warnings that fish caught in the waters fed by the American and Sacramento Rivers contain levels of mercury so high that fishers are warning to sharp curb their consumption of whatever they catch.
As the City of Richmond [just north of Berkeley] notes on its website:
Do not eat any fish from the Richmond Harbor Channel because high levels of mercury, PCBs, pesticides, DDT, dieldrin, and other chemicals have been found in the sediments on which the fish feed.
Mercury, PCBs, and other chemicals of concern have been found in fish from the San Francisco Bay. The amounts of chemicals found in fish in the San Francisco Bay are not known to cause immediate sickness. However, chemicals can collect in the body over time and may eventually affect your health or the health of your children. Adverse health effects that may occur from continued exposure to high levels of toxic chemicals in the fish include cancer, slower growth or brain damage in children, and kidney damage.
More from the the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board:
In humans, mercury is neurotoxic, affecting the brain and spinal cord, and interfering with nerve function. Pregnant women and nursing mothers can pass mercury to their fetuses and infants through the placenta and breast milk. In children, particularly those under age six, mercury can decrease brain size, delay physical development, impair mental abilities, cause abnormal muscle tone, and result in coordination problems. Substantial mercury exposure is also associated with birth defects and infant mortality. Adults exposed to mercury may experience abnormal sensations in their hands and feet, tiredness, or blurred vision. Higher levels of mercury exposure can impair hearing and speech. Long-term exposure can damage the kidneys.
Dangerous levels of mercury [represented by the red squares and triangles] are widely present in fish caught in America’s streams, as shown in this map from the U.S. Geological Survey:
Another map from the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment via the USGS, lakes and rivers in the Golden State with warnings of dangerous levels of mercury in fish catches:
Climate change promises to make things worse
All those streams and rivers empty into the world’s oceans, the ultimate dumping ground for all the chemicals we’ve been throwing into the environment with such reckless abandon.
Already, many species of ocean fish carry dangerous levels of mercury, with the dangers increasing all the way up to the top predators in the food chain, where mercury and other toxins are concentrated at the most dangerous levels by means of a process called biomagnification., illustrated in another graphic from the USGS:
A new study from Rutgers University reveals that climate change promises to make things worse. . .much worse, threatening a major source of vital protein for many of the world’s poorest people:
A highly toxic form of mercury could jump by 300 to 600 percent in zooplankton – tiny animals at the base of the marine food chain – if land runoff increases by 15 to 30 percent, according to a new study.
And such an increase is possible due to climate change, according to the pioneering study by Rutgers and other scientists published Friday [open access] in Science Advances.
“With climate change, we expect increased precipitation in many areas in the Northern Hemisphere, leading to more runoff,” said Jeffra K. Schaefer, study coauthor and assistant research professor in Rutgers’ Department of Environmental Sciences. “That means a greater discharge of mercury and organic carbon to coastal ecosystems, which leads to higher levels of mercury in the small animals living there. These coastal regions are major feeding grounds for fish, and thus the organisms living there serve as an important source of mercury that accumulates to high levels in the fish people like to eat.”
The study showed that an increase in natural organic matter entering coastal waters can boost the bioaccumulation of methylmercury – a highly toxic chemical found at elevated levels in many species of fish – in zooplankton by 200 to 700 percent. The huge increase in methylmercury shifts the food web from being autotrophic (largely microscopic plants and cyanobacteria that make food from inorganic matter) to heterotrophic (bacteria that eat organic matter produced by plants and cyanobacteria).
Natural organic matter from plants and animals in runoff also increased methylmercury levels in water by up to 200 percent, increasing exposure to the chemical in the food web, the study says.
Mercury is one of the top 10 chemicals of major public health concern, according to the World Health Organization (WHO), and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) says mercury is the main cause of fish consumption advisories aimed at protecting human health, the study notes.
Since the industrial era began, mercury that winds up in ecosystems is estimated to have increased by 200 to 500 percent, the study says. Mercury accumulates in fish and shellfish as methylmercury, which can affect the nervous, digestive and immune systems, as well as the lungs, kidneys, skin and eyes.
For the study, a group of scientists in Sweden tried to recreate the environmental conditions in a Bothnian Sea estuary off Sweden’s east coast. They created simulated ecosystems that took up two floors of a building. They collected intact sediment cores from the estuary, added water, nutrients and mercury, and studied what happened to the mercury, zooplankton and other organisms. Schaefer’s role was to study microorganisms in the sediment that are responsible for producing the methylmercury which accumulates in the food web.
The scientists sought to understand, model and predict the impact of climate change on mercury accumulation and methylmercury production, said Schaefer, who specializes in methylmercury research and is trying to understand how bacteria transform mercury into methylmercury.
The results showed the importance of including the food web-related impacts of climate change on the bioaccumulation of methylmercury in future mercury models and risk assessments, the study says.
“We found that the increase in organic matter changed the food web structure in the simulated estuary and that had an impact on the mercury accumulation in zooplankton,” Schaefer said. “That was the most dramatic effect.”
“This is quite an important study,” she added. “People haven’t really considered the changes in food web structure at the bottom of the food chain and a link to mercury accumulation. I think these findings are quite surprising and, in hindsight, they make sense.”
Efforts to reduce mercury emissions may be offset by the impacts of climate change, including increased precipitation and runoff, and we might not see an expected decrease of methylmercury in the food web, she said.
The study was led by Erik Björn of Umeå University in Sweden and conducted by lead author Sofi Jonsson, formerly with Umeå University and now at the University of Connecticut. Other authors include Agneta Andersson of Umeå University; Mats B. Nilsson and Ulf Skyllberg of the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences; Erik Lundberg of Umeå University; Schaefer; and Staffan Åkerblom of the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.