You know, the one in which a few small powers reject the overwhelming votes in their favor from a vast majority of the world’s nations.
First, from the Los Angeles Times:
‘How sweet it is,’ WikiLeaks’ Julian Assange declares after U.N. panel backs his freedom
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange said Friday he felt vindicated by the findings of a United Nations panel that ruled he should be allowed to walk free.
And the inevitable, via Deutsche Welle:
Assange stays put as Britain, Sweden reject UN decision
The British and Swedish authorities have rejected a UN panel’s findings and say WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange will still face arrest if he exits Ecuador’s embassy. He’s not budging, reports Samira Shackle from London
UPDATE: From The Real News Network, an interview [transcript] on Britain’s response with Assange’s own attorney:
UK Rejects UN Ruling that Assange Detention Is Illegal
After the UN finds Assange to be arbitrarily detained, Assange attorney Carey Shenkman explains how the UK is undermining the authority of the UN while simultaneously relying on it to release detained UK citizens
BBC News covers Old Blighty umbrage:
Julian Assange decision by UN panel ridiculous, says Hammond
The UK foreign secretary has branded as “ridiculous” a UN panel’s ruling that Julian Assange be allowed to go free, as the Wikileaks founder demanded the decision be respected.
And the response, via the Guardian:
Julian Assange accuses UK minister of insulting UN after detention finding
Foreign secretary Philip Hammond dismisses panel’s finding as ‘ridiculous’ but WikiLeaks founder hails ‘sweet victory’
Anonymous voices our own sentiments, and much more graphically:
Posted in Crime, Deep Politics, Europe, Governance, Hypocrisy, Law, Media, Politics, Secrecy, Spooks, Video, WikiLeaks diplomatic cables
In the second part [first part here] of “The Empire’s Border,” her report on the bloody politics of the United States’ southern border, The Empire Files‘ Abby Martin examines the origins of that boundary line in bloody conflict, America’s first imperial war against another American nation state.
Her focus then shifts to the first border wall, erected after a fierce street battle in the border town of Nogales, Arizona/Juarez, Mexico 98 years ago.
Adding immensely to the border tensions was the implementation of the North American Free Trade Agreement [and do watch Hillary’s spouse preaching its virtues on signing the treaty into law].
Then came 9/11, and the subsequent paranoia-enabled national security spending binge, in which fears of boundary leakage proved centers of immense profits and bureaucratic binging. . .
Increased deaths became inevitable, especially given a media fueled campaign of paranoia direction against brown-skinned people.
Well, we’ll leave the rest for you.
From teleSUR English:
The Empire Files: The Empire’s Border Part II – A Hidden War
In the second installment of this two-part episode, Abby Martin continues her investigation of the hidden war on the U.S.-Mexico border, looking at the root causes of the epidemic of migrant deaths. The Empire Files documents an inflated, paramilitary Border Patrol, the devastating impacts of NAFTA, how the U.S. Empire benefits from immigrant labor and what can change the equation.
Featuring interviews with Todd Miller, author of ‘Border Patrol Nation’, and Araceli Rodriguez, mother of Jose Antonio, a 16-year-old boy murdered by Border Patrol.
Posted in Children, Community, Corpocracy, Crime, Culture, Ethnicity, Family, Geopolitics, Governance, GWOT, History, Hypocrisy, Intolerance, Latin America, Law, Military, Politics, Poverty, Video, Warfare
The Trans-Pacific Partnership, the multinational Pacific Rim trading pact, negotiated in secret under the sway of corporate lobbyists and signed today in New Zealand, must be approved by Congress in order to take effect.
Hillary Clinton loves it, Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren don’t.
There are many reasons to loathe the TPP, including its secret tribunal capable of fining nations huge sums for enacting environmental, public health, and other barriers to protect citizens from unalloyed corporate rapacity.
Now comes another good reason, cancer.
From RT’s The Big Picture with Thom Hartmann:
What Today’s TPP Signing Means
Melinda St. Louis, Public Citizen’s Global Trade Watch & Zahara Heckscher, Writer/Educator/Social Justice Advocate join Thom. Representatives from 12 countries are gathering in the world’s most remote capital to finally sign the Trans-Pacific Partnership. What effect will this have on the effort to block the deal here in the US?
Posted in Asia, Cancer, Corpocracy, Deep Politics, Economy, Governance, Health, Latin America, Law, Medicine, Politics, Resources, Video, Wealth
Shkreli laughs off questions from lawmakers, calls them ‘imbeciles’
Former drug executive Martin Shkreli laughed off questions about drug prices and tweeted that lawmakers were imbeciles on Thursday, when he appeared at a U.S. congressional hearing against his will.
And from the Guardian:
- Shkreli invokes fifth amendment right not to answer questions about HIV drug
- So-called ‘most hated man in America’ hiked price of Daraprim 5,000%
And the Washington Post:
‘Pharma bro’ Shkreli stays silent before Congress, calls lawmakers ‘imbeciles’ in tweet
Shkreli, the former chief executive of Turing Pharmaceuticals, who gained notoriety for jacking up a little-known drug’s price, was excused from a House hearing on drug prices after he refused to answer any questions — other than how to pronounce his name correctly, or to confirm that, yes, he was listening.
And a screencap of the London Daily Mail homepage teaser for this story:
And the Los Angeles Times:
Smirking pharma CEO Martin Shkreli leaves lawmakers infuriated after hourlong showing
Shkreli appeared to smirk throughout his hourlong appearance, and moments after it ended, insulting tweets began to appear under his official Twitter account calling the lawmakers “imbeciles.”
“Appeared to smirk”?
We’ll let you, dear reader, be the judge. For your assistance, via vlogger TacoBurritoLegend:
Martin Shkreli Pharma Bro Smirking Compilation
Martin Shkreli smirked this much during his 10 minute hearing with Congress. Will he be held in contempt?
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has been subject to ‘arbitrary detention’ during the 3-1/2 years he has spent in the Ecuadorian embassy in London to avoid a rape investigation in Sweden, a U.N. panel will rule on Friday.
Assange, who enraged the United States by publishing hundreds of thousands of secret U.S. diplomatic cables, appealed to the panel saying he was a political refugee whose rights had been infringed by being unable to take up asylum in Ecuador.
The former computer hacker denies allegations of a 2010 rape in Sweden, saying the charge is a ploy that would eventually take him to the United States where a criminal investigation into the activities of WikiLeaks is still open.
UPDATE: From RT’s Ruptly TV:
Switzerland: UN decision on Assange ‘indirectly but still legally’ binding
Christophe Peschoux, a United Nations human rights official, said on Thursday in Geneva that a UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention decision on the case of Wikileaks founder Julian Assange would be “indirectly but still legally” binding on authorities.
Assange is currently being pursued by Swedish authorities over rapes he allegedly committed in the country in 2010, which he has always denied. Since 2012, fearing extradition by Britain, he has sheltered in the Ecuadorian embassy in London.
The UN panel releases its findings tomorrow, which are expected to conclude Assange is being “arbitrarily detained” in the UK. Swedish prosecutors claim the decision would have “no formal impact” on its ongoing investigation.
Two headlines from teleSUR, first dealing with the first of the two major trade deals now being promulgated:
Controversial TPP Deal Signed Amid Protests
The signing of the controversial trade deal took place in New Zealand as thousands of people protested against the deal
And the second, reporting a setback for the star chamber at the heart of all new neoliberal trade pacts:
German Judges Issue Landmark Opposition to TTIP Corporate Court
Germany’s largest association of judges warned Wednesday the sovereignty of European Union countries could be undermined by a proposed corporate court linked to the controversial Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership
From Ralph Nader, writing at his blog:
Minority House Leader Rep. Nancy Pelosi has unleashed her supine followers to start wounding and depreciating Sanders. Pelosi acolyte Adam Schiff (D. California) tells the media he doubts Sanders’s electability and he could have “very significant downstream consequences in House and Senate races.”
Mr. Schiff somehow ignores that the House and Senate Democratic leadership repeatedly could not defend the country from the worst Republican Party in history, whose dozens of anti-human, pro-big business votes should have toppled many GOP candidates. Instead, Nancy Pelosi has led the House Democrats to three straight calamitous losses (2010, 2012, 2014) to the Republicans, for whom public cruelties toward the powerless is a matter of principle.
Pelosi threw her own poisoned darts at Sanders, debunking his far more life-saving, efficient, and comprehensive, full Medicare-for-all plan with free choice of doctor and hospital with the knowingly misleading comment “We’re not running on any platform of raising taxes.” Presumably that includes continuing the Democratic Party’s practice of letting Wall Street, the global companies and the super-wealthy continue to get away with their profitable tax escapes.