From Industrial Revolution to global collapse?

Is a global warming time bomb about to explode above the Arctic Circle?

Well, consider the following. . .

Massive CO2, methane releases pose global dangers

Charles Miller, the principal investigator in NASA’s Carbon in Arctic Reservoirs Vulnerability Experiment [CARVE] offers a stark assessment of the impacts of carbon dioxide and methane released from the Arctic and the potential of massive releases there accelerating global warming across the globe.

In the interview with Thom Hartmann for RT America’s The Big Picture, Carver says current scenarios could see a rise in carbon dioxide emissions to a total of as much as 20-50 billion metric tons by 2040, and by 2100 160 to 250 mllion metric tons — the latter number equivalent to all the carbon dioxide emitted by the industrial revolution since 1950.

Methane emissions would accelerate as the Arctic warms.

Climate change already underway in the Arctic, with the greatest impact on land surface, which also features a precarious living environment.

Is a Sleeping Giant Stirring in the Arctic?

The program notes:

Carbon in our atmosphere is a principal driver of climate change. And there’s a massive amount of carbon locked up in the earth’s northern polar region. So, NASA has decided to find out exactly how much carbon is in the Arctic region and how stable or unstable it might be and how it’s reacting to climate change. Joining me now for more on this is Dr. Charles Miller – Research Scientist & principal investigator of the Carbon in Arctic Reservoirs Vulnerability Experiment (CARVE) – a five-year NASA-led field campaign studying how climate change is affecting the Arctic’s carbon cycle.

New study warns of major methane releases

The release of methane, once seen as unlikely, is now being raised as a potentially catastrophic threat.

From Nafeez Ahmed of The Guardian:

A new paper [PDF] in the journal Nature argues that the release of a 50 Gigatonne (Gt) methane pulse from thawing Arctic permafrost could destabilise the climate system and trigger costs as high as the value of the entire world’s GDP. The East Siberian Arctic Shelf’s (ESAS) reservoir of methane gas hydrates could be released slowly over 50 years or “catastrophically fast” in a matter of decades – if not even one decade – the researchers said.

Not everyone agrees that the paper’s scenario of a catastrophic and imminent methane release is plausible. Nasa’s Gavin Schmidt has previously argued that the danger of such a methane release is low, whereas scientists like Prof Tim Lenton from Exeter University who specialises in climate tipping points, says the process would take thousands if not tens of thousands of years, let alone a decade.

But do most models underestimate the problem? A new paper in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) projects that the Arctic will be ice free in September by around 2054-58. This, however, departs significantly from empirical observations of the rapid loss of Arctic summer sea ice which is heading for disappearance within two or three years according to Nature co-author and renowned Arctic expert Prof Peter Wadhams, head of the Polar ocean physics group at Cambridge University.

Read the rest.

More from the BBC:

The researchers estimate that the climate effects of the release of this gas could cost $60 trillion (£39 trillion), roughly the size of the global economy in 2012.

The impacts are most likely to be felt in developing countries they say.

The research has been published in the journal Nature.

Scientists have had concerns about the impact of rising temperatures on permafrost for many years. Large amounts of methane are concentrated in the frozen Arctic tundra but are also found as semi-solid gas hydrates under the sea.

Read the rest.

And back to The Guardian for this from John Vidal:

The Arctic sea ice, which largely melts and reforms each year, is declining at an unprecedented rate. In 2012, it collapsed to under 3.5m sqkm by mid September, just 40% of its usual extent in the 1970s. Because the ice is also losing its thickness, some scientists expect the Arctic ocean to be largely free of summer ice by 2020.

The growing fear is that as the ice retreats, the warming of the sea water will allow offshore permafrost to release ever greater quantities of methane. A giant reservoir of the greenhouse gas, in the form of gas hydrates on the East Siberian Arctic Shelf (ESAS), could be emitted, either slowly over 50 years or catastrophically fast over a shorter time frame, say the researchers.

The ramifications of vanishing ice will also be felt far from the poles, they say because the region is pivotal to the functioning of Earth systems, such as oceans and climate. “The imminent disappearance of the summer sea ice in the Arctic will have enormous implications for both the acceleration of climate change, and the release of methane from off-shore waters which are now able to warm up in the summer,” said Prof Peter Wadhams, head of the Polar ocean physics group at Cambridge University and one of the authors of the paper published in the journal Nature.

Read the rest.

And the bottom line is. . .

The massive production of rapidly obsolescing goods to feed the finance-driven dictates of global economic growth carries a high price tag, and the tragedy is that many of those who enjoyed the benefits won’t be the ones to pay the costs, as the carnage is off-loaded on the poor and the generations to come. . .or not to come.

4 responses to “From Industrial Revolution to global collapse?

  1. Dan Pangburn

    Demonstrated again. Noncondensing greenhouse gases have no significant influence on average global temperature.

    GW ended before 2001.

    AGW never was.

  2. Gray Brechin

    I notice from the chart of the concerns most bugging Americans that the environment doesn’t even rate.

    Then I look at the distractive folly that fills the mass media and I know we are all toast.

  3. Dana Livingston

    I’m no climate scientist, hence am in no position to make any informed statements about the ‘anthropogenic’ aspect of climate change, but what I do find intolerably myopic is the near-exclusive focus on greenhouse gasses, when industry, extractive capitalism and consumerism are hastening the guaranteed destruction of the planet if measures aren’t taken quickly and effectively to stop the underpinnings of the growth imperative.

    So much focus on greenhouse gasses when precious fresh water is being polluted on a massive scale by agricultural chemical runoff; hormone- and drug- laced waste water, altering the behavior and reproductive capacities of aquatic species; the use of quantities of chemical-laden fresh water used in ‘fracking’, to name only a few.

    And what about the massive destruction of topsoil and irreplaceable forests, and confiscation of land by gigantic agribusiness corporations?

    Then there’s the sword of Damocles over the ‘heads’ of all life on this planet, in the form of nuclear power and nuclear cataclysms, such as Chernobyl, which polluted much of Europe, and now the Fukushima disaster, still totally out of control, contaminating Japan and the Pacific ocean …

    And here we are focussing almost exclusively on greenhouse gasses and ‘climate change’?! Sure, taxation of gas emissions would generate a brand new global financial market, yet another one, at a time when it is vital that we address the broader picture of global industrial pollution in all of its forms.

    If human contribution to climate change is indeed a real problem, it would be solved by holding global corporations financially responsible for pollution and by introducing alternatives to the current debt-based financial system.

  4. Pingback: The worldwide number of methane hot spots has soared 32 percent so far this year despite the economic slowdown, according to satellite imagery – NBC 101

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s